Search for: "Austin v. Hunter" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 11:18 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Austin and Andrea Slane (University of Toronto - Faculty of Law and University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Legal Studies) have posted Digitally Rethinking Hunter v Southam on SSRN. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:39 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
Austin, Oct. 1, 2013, Androscoggin Superior Court More Blog Entries: Strout v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by Christine Hurt
  (My favorite case is one known to Texans in my age cohort -- Boyles v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
” Coverage of yesterday’s decision in the hovercraft hunter case Sturgeon v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:05 am
Hunter, Student Director; and Holli Austin-Belaski, Student Intern. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am by Bruce Khula
Supreme Court decisions that form the basis of the “political structure doctrine”: Hunter v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
University of Texas at Austin to overrule Grutter v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (458 U.S. 457, 1982) and Hunter v Erickson (393 U.S. 385, 1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:24 am by Amy Starnes
Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, suggested legislators in the upcoming session will try to clarify the act to tighten up the loophole created by Boeing v. [read post]